I’ve received many more deleted the author’s name because the following comment, which I made at this other blogsite, was not posted. I havNo, Increasing CO2 isn’t going to trigger a hot world without clouds. “I’ve received many more requests about the new disappearing-clouds study than the “gold standard proof of anthropogenic warming” study I addressed here, both of which appeared in Nature journals over the last several days.” But I just discovered the following ‘No, Increasing CO2 isn’t going to trigger a hot world without clouds.’ This comment has nothing to do with Herb’s posting. Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method. Telephone: Calls from within the UK: 020 7419 5027. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. There is no tendency for matter to move to a state of disorder but a directive to move to an equalization or order with the controlling energy field they are a part of. They are being destroyed by trying to equalize with the Earth’s smaller energy field by losing the energy acquired from the sun’s energy field. Most of them self destruct before they reach the atmosphere. The apparent disorder observed in systems is result of matter moving into a different controlling energy field and a redirection of its effort to equalize with that energy field.Ī meteor entering the Earth’s energy field is not being destroyed by the atmosphere.
When the Voyager satellites left the energy of our solar system they became a part of the Milky Way’s energy unit and their movement, velocity, and position were referenced to that energy rather than the sun. If a part of a unit, like an electron, leaves its controlling energy field in the atom its movement and direction will then be determined by the larger energy field controlling that system/unit. In the universe there are various centers, units, of controlling energy that direct the movement of matter (atoms, molecules, planets, solar systems, galaxies, etc.) that are under their control. If a general takes control of the crowd it will become an army with its actions directed to a common goal as directed by the general. If a police officer arrives he will use his control to bring some order to the crowd as his motivation now takes precedence over the motivation of the individuals in the crowd. If there is a crowd of people in an area there appears to be complete disorder but each person in the crowd has his own motivation directing their actions. Any changes in these systems are rare and are not the result a spontaneous deterioration of the systems but from the interaction of some other system. The atom, solar system, galaxies, and galaxy clusters all seem to be stable ordered systems that remain the same for billions of years. The theory of entropy is not a basic law of physics but defies all observation. To try and morph entropy onto these laws is like passing a law that says you must disobey the laws. The laws of thermodynamics are a description of how this ordering of a system works. Equilibrium is a ordering of a system not it becoming chaotic. The action of molecules to transfer energy and equalize is not a tendency to disorder but an effort to become uniform. This homogenous state is what is considered disorder? What would be an ordered state? The number and properties of the molecules in any set volume of the container will be the same as any other same volume of the container. If a group of similar molecules, with different energies and charges, are put into a perfectly insulated container, the molecules will attain equal distribution of energy and charge within the container. Entropy: the tendency for matter in a system to move to a state of disorder.
0 kommentar(er)
